USA Right now slammed for publishing POTUS’ op-ed

0 24

A POPULAR American information outlet has come underneath hearth for selecting to publish an opinion piece written by President Donald Trump.

In a single day, USA Right now printed an opinion piece Mr Trump wrote about “Medicare For All”, the Democrats’ healthcare proposal.

The piece was a uncommon transfer for Mr Trump, printed one month earlier than the midterm elections. Within the article, Mr Trump claimed that Democrats’ single-payer healthcare plan would impression seniors by stripping their advantages.

“The reality is that the centrist Democratic Celebration is useless,” Mr Trump wrote. “The brand new Democrats are radical socialists who wish to mannequin America’s financial system after Venezuela.”

The difficulty, based on some critics, is the piece was riddled with untruths.

Washington Put up fact-checker Glenn Kessler posted a fierce take-down of the story on Twitter, earlier than issuing a sentence-by-sentence correction of each one of many President’s statements:

How can @usatoday permit Trump tp publish an article with documented falsehoods? by way of @usatoday

— Glenn Kessler (@GlennKesslerWP) October 10, 2018

“Democrats have already harmed seniors by slashing Medicare by greater than $800 billion over 10 years to pay for Obamacare.” This can be a drained 2012 speaking level. Seniors weren’t “harmed.” The solvency was prolonged and advantages had been expanded.

— Glenn Kessler (@GlennKesslerWP) October 10, 2018

“I’ve saved that [preexisting] promise, and we are actually seeing medical health insurance premiums coming down.” Trump supported plans that will have weakened pre-existing protections, and specialists say premiums could be even decrease if Trump hadn’t weakened the regulation

— Glenn Kessler (@GlennKesslerWP) October 10, 2018

Then the article descends right into a sequence of false claims about open borders and many others taken from his stump speeches. Trump may make a robust case in opposition to Medicare for all, based mostly on actual information. Why did not @usatoday insist on that form of article so there could be a critical debate?

— Glenn Kessler (@GlennKesslerWP) October 10, 2018

The editors of different main publications additionally criticised the outlet for publishing the story.

Former New York Occasions editorial web page editor Andrew Rosenthal prompt it was unsuitable to print opinion items or letters that hadn’t been appropriately fact-checked.

“The President doesn’t have a free move,” he instructed CNN. “Our customary on the Occasions was that we don’t print issues that we knew to not be true, whether or not it was a letter, an editorial, a column or an op-ed. If a letter author mentioned one thing that was false, we might require them to right or we wouldn’t run it.

“We turned down op-eds from extraordinarily high-ranking individuals on a regular basis. We turned them down in the event that they had been self-serving, repetitive, filled with lies.”

Likewise, Boston Globe op-ed web page editor Marjorie Pritchard mentioned all opinion items printed must be based mostly on truth.

“All submissions should undergo a strong and rigorous modifying course of, which incorporates fact-checking and attribution. The op-ed web page presents various opinions on problems with the day, however they must be based mostly on information, not on inaccuracies or outright lies,” she mentioned.

“It’s essential that we maintain the President to the identical requirements we demand of different contributors.”

CNN White Home correspondent Jim Acosta tweeted that the variety of untruths printed within the column could also be record-breaking.

His submit was retweeted over 15,000 instances.

This column might break the document for the variety of falsehoods from a President ever printed in a newspaper op-Ed. Simply this tweet alone is fake – “outlaw non-public well being care plans” and “letting anybody cross our border” Huh? Reality examine: false and false. Come on USA Right now.

— Jim Acosta (@Acosta) October 10, 2018

USA Right now’s editorial web page editor, Invoice Sternberg, defended the outlet’s resolution to publish Mr Trump’s op-ed.

“USA Right now Opinion gives a discussion board for a range of views on problems with nationwide relevance. We see ourselves as America’s dialog centre, presenting our readers with voices from the correct, left and center,” he mentioned in an announcement posted on Twitter. “President Trump’s op-ed was handled like different column submissions; we examine factual assertions whereas permitting authors large leeway to specific their opinions.

“Readers are invited to submit opposing viewpoints and supply extra context, a few of which will probably be printed within the days forward.”

Supply hyperlink –

You might also like

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.